Connectivism

• How has your network changed the way you learn?

Information is abundant and fragmented. For curriculum development, I spend most of my time filtering and creating critical thinking and problem-based learning activities from the information for the students to practice.

• Which digital tools best facilitate learning for you?

1) For curriculum and teacher development, I access the internet for science sites and educator sharing sites, professional development videotaped workshops in Annenberg Media.

2) For students, I access the internet for science tutorials, videocasts, YouTube and TeacherTube for science demonstrations and hands-on lab ideas.

3) For home school students, we use Breeze for online “live” teaching sessions.

4) For teacher collaboration, I use Skype, Conference Calls, Breeze, as well as monthly live meetings.

5) For the highly intense Robotics team 6-week build, we communicate through emails, blogs, and the Robokong website when we are not together. We also post our team videos on YouTube for other teams to view. We access a blog site called Chief Delphi where several teams come together with discussions and ideas.

6) Google docs are used frequently by spontaneous teams at our school.

• How do you learn new knowledge when you have questions?

I use the internet, Walden library database, email colleagues, or post blogs for information gathering.

Constructivism - Collaboration - Technologies

Blog Walden course 8845 - Module 3

Do you believe that humans have a basic instinct to “interact and work as a group,” as Rheingold proposed in his discussion of the evolution of Wikipedia as a collectively developed encyclopedia? How can technology facilitate collaboration among learners based on constructivist principles?

Rheingold (“Howard Rheingold: Way-New Collaboration”
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/howard_rheingold_on_collaboration.html) could have gone back further in time, perhaps before the hunting parties, and discovered the basic foundation of human existence and survival was the grouping and working together of the family unit. Recently, I learned that the founders of F.I.R.S.T. (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology) copyrighted their national theme of “gracious professionalism.” This is the organization that Dean Kamen (inventor of the Segway) and Woody Flowers founded to get high school students involved in engineering team collaboration for problem-solving, building, and testing robots for competitions each year. Even the competition is run in teams or alliances, which change each match. Success of each team is dependent on their ability to work with two other teams each match to accomplish the goals of the game. Twelve years later, there are over 3,000 teams across the US and internationally that compete.

Rheingold also stated that “the trans-disciplinary cooperation project is not going to just happen”, implying that we need to drive it. In my opinion, it is already happening with the “fourth wave” (an extension of futurist Toffler’s third wave) of social networking and collaboration as seen in the many examples he gave: Wikipedia, Google, Amazon, Think Cycles, eBay, open sourcing, Human Genome Project, Elli Lilly, Toyota and its suppliers, IBM and patents for commons. Whatever the motivations or driving forces, there is an innate need in humans to collaborate and work together in groups. As technology develops, so goes the collaboration.

Brainstorming in our robotic team this week has reminded me of the synergism of ideas. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts. They are also collaborating with mentors from the local university engineering department as well as blogging with teams from all over the country that are working on the same problem (chiefdelphi community of forums and blogging). Constructivism principles are the framework, technologies provide the engine, and collaboration is the energy that powers the vehicle of tomorrow today.