Connectivism

• How has your network changed the way you learn?

Information is abundant and fragmented. For curriculum development, I spend most of my time filtering and creating critical thinking and problem-based learning activities from the information for the students to practice.

• Which digital tools best facilitate learning for you?

1) For curriculum and teacher development, I access the internet for science sites and educator sharing sites, professional development videotaped workshops in Annenberg Media.

2) For students, I access the internet for science tutorials, videocasts, YouTube and TeacherTube for science demonstrations and hands-on lab ideas.

3) For home school students, we use Breeze for online “live” teaching sessions.

4) For teacher collaboration, I use Skype, Conference Calls, Breeze, as well as monthly live meetings.

5) For the highly intense Robotics team 6-week build, we communicate through emails, blogs, and the Robokong website when we are not together. We also post our team videos on YouTube for other teams to view. We access a blog site called Chief Delphi where several teams come together with discussions and ideas.

6) Google docs are used frequently by spontaneous teams at our school.

• How do you learn new knowledge when you have questions?

I use the internet, Walden library database, email colleagues, or post blogs for information gathering.

Constructivism - Collaboration - Technologies

Blog Walden course 8845 - Module 3

Do you believe that humans have a basic instinct to “interact and work as a group,” as Rheingold proposed in his discussion of the evolution of Wikipedia as a collectively developed encyclopedia? How can technology facilitate collaboration among learners based on constructivist principles?

Rheingold (“Howard Rheingold: Way-New Collaboration”
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/howard_rheingold_on_collaboration.html) could have gone back further in time, perhaps before the hunting parties, and discovered the basic foundation of human existence and survival was the grouping and working together of the family unit. Recently, I learned that the founders of F.I.R.S.T. (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology) copyrighted their national theme of “gracious professionalism.” This is the organization that Dean Kamen (inventor of the Segway) and Woody Flowers founded to get high school students involved in engineering team collaboration for problem-solving, building, and testing robots for competitions each year. Even the competition is run in teams or alliances, which change each match. Success of each team is dependent on their ability to work with two other teams each match to accomplish the goals of the game. Twelve years later, there are over 3,000 teams across the US and internationally that compete.

Rheingold also stated that “the trans-disciplinary cooperation project is not going to just happen”, implying that we need to drive it. In my opinion, it is already happening with the “fourth wave” (an extension of futurist Toffler’s third wave) of social networking and collaboration as seen in the many examples he gave: Wikipedia, Google, Amazon, Think Cycles, eBay, open sourcing, Human Genome Project, Elli Lilly, Toyota and its suppliers, IBM and patents for commons. Whatever the motivations or driving forces, there is an innate need in humans to collaborate and work together in groups. As technology develops, so goes the collaboration.

Brainstorming in our robotic team this week has reminded me of the synergism of ideas. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts. They are also collaborating with mentors from the local university engineering department as well as blogging with teams from all over the country that are working on the same problem (chiefdelphi community of forums and blogging). Constructivism principles are the framework, technologies provide the engine, and collaboration is the energy that powers the vehicle of tomorrow today.

Behaviorism vs cognitivism OR behaviorism in support of cognitivism and beyond…..

I am what Karl Kapp referred to as one of the retiring baby boomers and my college student son, GK, would classify as one of the incoming gamers -
Behaviorism has its place

I have been observing GK’s self-motivated, self-initiated learning behaviors this week and interviewed him. Here’s a summary of my detail observations and then I will try to draw some conclusions on how learning by today’s digital age students relates to radical behaviorism and cognitive learning theories:

GK Case Study
1) Created a video today after self-teaching Sony Vegas Movie Studio software– why? Not assigned, not for credit, as a means to an end self-initiated goal
2) Practiced learning Solid Works software – why? Not assigned, not for credit, as a means to an end goal of near future applications in engineering program and possible applications to robot build starting in 2 weeks
3) Gaming – for fun, part of a “clan” or club, sometimes plays for competition (won 3rd place as sniper out of 30 players)
4) Constant trial and error whenever problem-solving compared to classroom mentality of teacher-directed with right or wrong answers; and does not encourage risk-taking, experimentation, or thinking like a scientist.
5) What works and what he likes about his recent computer programming class with a teacher-directed agenda – teacher modeled, students practiced on computer as teacher was modeling process, any errors in class were shared so group could benefit, peer tutoring when needed to help keep everyone together, each week project assigned with end goal – but students could choose many different paths to attain goal and it usually involved lots of problem-solving because there was not one prescribed “right” answer.
6) “I am motivated to accomplish a goal and the learning part is just a means to get to my goal”, for example, “ my goal is to build a robot, so I learn CAD” or “my goal is to make a video, so I learn the Sony software”

Although some may think behaviorism is dead - Stephen Downes – “…it remains puzzling that so much of the instructional design community remains rooted in behaviorism - this more than 30 years after the theory was abandoned everywhere else;” I concur with Bill Kerr – Bill Kerr_isms and Karl Kapp - Behaviorism has its place that behaviorism is alive and well.

Unfortunately, “external” behaviorism is the primary learning theory that is functioning today in many classrooms for the teacher’s end goal of classroom management, student engagement, student motivation, content rote learning (to pass mandated state tests), summative assessment of mastering content standard objectives.

The “inner” environment of behaviorism - Behaviorism-and-inner-environment - is a stepping stone and will always be a contributing factor in the learning process as the student integrates cognitivism and connectivism. Bill Kerr summarizes his collection of blogs “It seems to me that each _ism is offering something useful without any of them being complete or stand alone in their own right.” - Bill Kerr_isms

If the environment is teacher-directed, then a complex series of behaviorism strategies must be established to encourage learning in a prescribed, non-engaging scenario. Rob Costello, in his pedagogy of poverty and learning blog - Rob Costello – describes one outcome of forcing students to deal with abstractions before they are ready as lacking curiosity. I would add that many of the teacher-directed classroom strategies in place and the student outcomes are also common to schools not in urban poverty areas.

However, if the environment is student-directed, many of these external behaviorism learning strategies may not be needed. The student has the freedom of choice, is intrinsically motivated to question, problem-solve, to take risks and go with trial and error without fear of failure, is free to think like a scientist, creatively composes and works relentlessly at learning whatever is needed to accomplish the end goal. Student is practicing problem-solving, analyzing, evaluating, finding connections, researching history, collaborating, and critical thinking. Inner behaviorism is evident as student generates their own steps and tests in the process of accomplishing their goal. Student derives motivation and inspiration as they strive to accomplish the goal they have set for themselves.

Karl Kapp in his ABCD Objectives blog sums it up: “The ideal learning opportunity is probably something in the middle. Create a broad learning goal and then set the learners free to achieve the goal. We did this with Lego Robotics, we got a bunch of middle school kids together and told them to build and program a fast Lego car and then we let them fill in the specifics. You could literally walk around the room and ‘see’ the kids learning.”

Tags: educational technology, learning, elearning, learning theories, behaviorism, cognitivism, inner environment, critical thinking, problem-solving, motivation, creativity

Siemens' Metaphors of Educators

Metaphors of Educators (Siemens, 2008)
Although all four metaphors have elements that are valuable in an active, hands-on, inquiry, critical thinking, project-based learning environment of constructivism and connectivism, I was attracted to the curator educator. The teacher as curator expert can be the most effective guide for students with application and relevancy issues. The greatest challenge for this teacher will be to keep the breaks on themselves, not be tempted to answer student questions as much as to find creative ways to draw the students into exploration, research, critical thinking, and seeking their own answers. The curator may choose to use tools mentioned in the other metaphors such as the atelier model from the master artist, soft guidance from the concierge, and network administration guidance.

The effectiveness of these teaching strategies are not new, are well substantiated in research, but in my experience at traditional and charter public schools, are not being practiced in the secondary classrooms. The five high school academy science teachers that I am working with are really being stretched to even consider “inqurizing” their recipe-type labs. We also had a discussion this week about going textbook-less in our LMS Moodle curriculum, and that was unimaginable to them – they still wanted some version of some textbook. My view is to integrate technologies with Module themes, have open networking among teacher and students (like we practice at Walden), dig deep in the main topic for an entire semester and culminate it with a project, chosen and researched by the student. Instead of teaching to the state test, let the students dig deep and learn from non-lecture based classroom environments with a curator type teacher facilitating the process.

Here’s a video resource for “Teaching High School Science” from Annenberg Media (http://www.learner.org/resources/series126.html#) using different levels of inquiry, getting the students to formulate their own questions from their observations and prior knowledge, and to design their own experiments. This kind of resource is very helpful for teachers to model how they can conduct the same lab at different levels of inquiry and critical thinking challenges for the students – teacher’s choice!!

References:

Siemens, G. (2008, January 27). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. Paper presented to ITFORUM. Retrieved from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/Paper105 /Siemens.pdf

Siemens, G. (2005, April 5). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm.

Ertmer, P. & Newby, T. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6 (4): 50-72 retrieved online from http://uow.ico5.janison.com/ed/subjects/edgi911w/readings/ertmerp1.pdf.

ROBOMORPH - if you are wondering why I chose this name, it has nothing to do with the power rangers. I have been working with a high school robotics team for the past 2 years and I have seen a transformation (metamorphosis) in students as they emerge out of their cocoons into a land of inspiration and technology....